Skip to content

Downsview, ON · Private foundation

The S & L Stern Foundation

The selection and distribution of funds to qualified donees.

C$234k
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$51k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k41 grants · C$70k
  • C$10k–50k7 grants · C$112k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$51k
C$1,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$450k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KHAL TORAS CHESSEDC$51,440
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$23,423
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$23,120
MEIR BAAL HANESC$18,100
ZICHRON YISROEL YOSEPHC$13,698
BAIS YAKOOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$13,600
KOLLEL AVREICHIMC$10,000
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MIRC$10,000
YASDODDEI HATORAHC$8,555
YASHIVAH GEDOLASC$7,500
NACHLAS TZVIC$5,460
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOLC$5,200
ECHOC$4,000
TOMCHEI SHABBOSC$3,650
BIKUR CHOLIMC$2,860
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.6M · 69 repeat orgsC$122k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

69 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
80

Total granted

C$1.6M
C$98k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+11%

Still filing today

90%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KT
    KHAL TORAS CHESED
    4× · 2019–2024 · C$255k · revenue ×13
  • JH
    Jewish Heritage Fund
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$144k · revenue +423%
  • BY
    Bais Yaakov
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$135k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • KT
    KOLLEL TORONTO
    one grant, 2023 · C$50k · revenue +12%
  • B
    Baycrestgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k · revenue +33%
  • CO
    CHAVERIM OF THE COMMUNITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue ×12

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
3
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
4
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
5
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
6
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
7
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
8
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
9
Kollel Yisroel Dovid

The charity provides scholarships to fund talmudic research.

—
10
Mishmeret

During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.

—
11
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
12
Ezrat Mehabrim

Issued scholarships for religious education

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Les Amis Canadiens Du Seminaire Yeshivah Mirer De Jerusalem Inc./Canadian Friends of the Seminary Yeshivah Mirer of Jerusalem and the most unlike its peers is Les Amis Du College Mestiva of Lakewood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

123 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 123 of the 162 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
113/123
Grantees still filing
77/123
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKHAL TORAS CHESED — C$254,895 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetJewish Heritage Fund — C$143,666 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBais Yaakov — C$135,230 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetTOLLEL TORONTO — C$126,920 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetKOLLEL OHALEI YOM TOV — C$86,220 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetYesodei Hatorah — C$79,928 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetYeshivah Mir — C$74,432 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetrabbi Meir Baal Haness — C$70,450 over 2y, 12% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$60,117 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetCANADIAN FRIEND OF BETH AVROHOM — C$52,800 over 3y, 63% of budgetKOLLEL TORONTO — C$50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetTomechai Shabbos — C$44,057 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetRABBI MEIR BAAL HANESS — C$42,330 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetYeshiva Mishkan Hatorah — C$42,330 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetToronto Cheder — C$41,985 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetHachnosas Kallah — C$36,768 over 6y, 6.4% of budgetChofetz Chaim Heritage — C$34,851 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetBikur Cholim — C$25,744 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetYEHIVAH NACLAS TZVI — C$24,091 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetYeshiva Nefesh Dovid — C$18,660 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetEcho — C$18,062 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetBETH OLOTH — C$16,451 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS CHAYA — C$15,976 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetZICHRON YISROEL YOSEPH — C$13,698 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL — C$12,689 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetYESHIVAH GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYU — C$12,150 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBobov — C$10,570 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBNOS CHAYA — C$9,151 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetChai Lifeline — C$8,914 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNscy — C$8,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRockwood Cares Torah — C$7,452 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$7,435 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYeshiva Gedolah — C$7,290 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OFHILLEL — C$6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPath of Torah School — C$5,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBaycrest — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetECHO — C$4,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetProject Inspire — C$4,795 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMISASKIN CANADA — C$4,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTOMECHAI SHABBOS — C$4,399 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKH MEORATH — C$4,317 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCF YAD ELEIZER — C$4,060 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOBOB — C$3,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHAVERIM OF THE COMMUNITY — C$3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetShomrai shabbos — C$2,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$2,700 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKOLLEL OHEL YOM TOV — C$2,200 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNER ISRAEL — C$2,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KHAL TORAS CHESED ↗
  • Who funds Jewish Heritage Fund ↗
  • Who funds Bais Yaakov ↗
  • Who funds TOLLEL TORONTO ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL OHALEI YOM TOV ↗
  • Who funds Yesodei Hatorah ↗
  • Who funds Yeshivah Mir ↗
  • Who funds rabbi Meir Baal Haness ↗
  • Who funds BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FRIEND OF BETH AVROHOM ↗
  • Who funds KOLLEL TORONTO ↗
  • Who funds Tomechai Shabbos ↗
  • Who funds RABBI MEIR BAAL HANESS ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Mishkan Hatorah ↗
  • Who funds Toronto Cheder ↗
  • Who funds Hachnosas Kallah ↗
  • Who funds Chofetz Chaim Heritage ↗
  • Who funds Bikur Cholim ↗
  • Who funds YEHIVAH NACLAS TZVI ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Nefesh Dovid ↗
  • Who funds Echo ↗
  • Who funds BETH OLOTH ↗
  • Who funds BNOS CHAYA ↗
  • Who funds ZICHRON YISROEL YOSEPH ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAH GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYU ↗
  • Who funds Bobov ↗
  • Who funds BNOS CHAYA ↗
  • Who funds Chai Lifeline ↗
  • Who funds Nscy ↗
  • Who funds Rockwood Cares Torah ↗
  • Who funds BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Yeshiva Gedolah ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN FRIENDS OFHILLEL ↗
  • Who funds Path of Torah School ↗
  • Who funds Baycrest ↗
  • Who funds ECHO ↗
  • Who funds Project Inspire ↗
  • Who funds MISASKIN CANADA ↗
  • Who funds TOMECHAI SHABBOS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zolty Charitable FoundationON58× affinity60 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zolty Charitable Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · The Daniel and Vera Rubinstein Charitable Foundation · The Gross Family Foundation · Schofam Charitable Foundation · The S. Sigler Family Charitable Foundation · The Dov Zimmerman Z'L Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 162 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations advancing education.

Source object 889090163:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on S & L Stern’s filings →