North York, ON · Charitable organization
Bais Chaya Mushkah School for Girls
To establish an orthodox jewish school for girls devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith as well as general academic studies.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MEVISTA OHR TEMIMIN LUBAVITCH | C$9,600 |
| KAYLA'S CHILDREN'S CENTRE | C$5,000 |
| LAMPLIGHTERS | C$4,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- BCBAIS CHOMESH HIGH SCHOOL2× · 2019–2020 · C$30k · revenue +47%
- KCKUPAT CHESSED MEOROTH3× · 2017–2019 · C$13k · revenue +49%
- TCTORONTO CHESSED FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2023 · C$13k · revenue +150%
Funded once
- BMBAIS MENACHEMone grant, 2020 · C$2.6M · revenue -87% · 92% of their budget
- JFJEWISH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$1.9M · revenue +87%
- COCHAVERIM OF THE COMMUNITYgraduatedone grant, 2019 · C$114k · revenue ×18 · 72% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
Support of jewish education and institutions
The charity maintained an educational program to assist students in enhancing their knowledge and expertise in various areas pertaining to judaic studies.
To establish an orthodox jewish school for girls devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith as well as general academic studies. to preach and advance the spiritual teachings of the orthodox jewish sect known…
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
The charity provides scholarships
Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.
The charity collected funds from the public for the purpose of providing scholarships for deserving students attending haichel hatorah b'zion institutions.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chaverim of the Community and the most unlike its peers is The Lamplighter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BAIS MENACHEM ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHAVERIM OF THE COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds BAIS CHOMESH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MESIVTA OHR TEMIMIM LUBAVITCH ↗
- Who funds CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF AURORA ↗
- Who funds Tziivos Hashem ↗
- Who funds KUPAT CHESSED MEOROTH ↗
- Who funds TORONTO CHESSED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KAYLA'S CHILDREN'S CENTRE ↗
- Who funds BNEI AKIVA SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LAMPLIGHTERS ↗
- Who funds Chabad Lubavitch of Ontario ↗
- Who funds ACHIM TORONTO ↗
- Who funds Shmuel Zahavy Israeli School ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rayjo Charitable Trust · My Charity Fund · Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond Hill · Jewish Niagara · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Chabad at Western · Bais Tefilloh Franklin · Chabad of Mississauga · Tzivos Hashem Canada Inc · Mashiyev Family Foundation · CharityEx Foundation · Chabad of Midtown
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.