Skip to content

North York, ON · Charitable organization

Tzivos Hashem Canada Inc

Providing educational programs for adults youth and children in Toronto Operating 3 synagogues Providing family counselling services

C$765k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$296k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$11k
  • C$10k–50k6 grants · C$169k
  • C$50k–250k3 grants · C$291k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$296k
C$25,030
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL YESHIVA LUBAVITZC$295,525
MITZVA CHARITY FNDC$161,190
KAM SHOLOM KHMC$75,630
KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTEC$53,750
EITZ CHAIM SCHOOLC$49,450
YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAC$32,450
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOLC$28,600
MESIVTA LUBAVITCH TORONTOC$25,030
AGUDATH CHASIDEI CHABADC$17,243
BAIS CHOMESHC$15,758
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOLC$5,000
CAMP GAN ISRAELC$2,485
LUBAVICH DAY CAMPC$1,357
CHARITYEX FOUNDATIONC$1,250
CHEDER CHABADC$435
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 71% of grant dollars (C$5.4M). The 29% that went abroad (C$2.2M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 29% of all-years giving (C$2.2M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
USC$942k · 5 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$7.0M · 23 repeat orgsC$689k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
21

Total granted

C$7.0M
C$641k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+14%

Still filing today

83%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KD
    KOLEL DAF YOMI
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$266k · revenue +24%
  • KS
    KAM SHOLOM KHM
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$222k · revenue +28%
  • BC
    BAIS CHOMESH
    5× · 2017–2023 · C$117k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • MF
    MAHADURAS FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · C$199k · revenue -21%
  • MC
    Mitzvah Charity Fund
    one grant, 2021 · C$141k
  • GO
    GATES OF MERCY
    one grant, 2019 · C$75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
2
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
3
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
4
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
5
Yeshiva Gedolah Zichron Shmayahu

Maintained a religious school for the training and instruction of religious scholars maintained a house of worship in compliance with the requirements and practices of the jewish faith in the orthodox tradition.

—
6
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
7
Yeshivas Nachalas Zvi

Operating a postsecondary institution for educating boys in orthodox jewish faith.

—
8
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
9
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
10
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
11
Mesorah Montessori School

Advance the teachings of the jewish faith religious tenets and doctrines.

—
12
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesivta Lubavitch Toronto and the most unlike its peers is CharityEx Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKH MEOROTH — C$2,129,798 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMITZVAH CHARITY FUND — C$1,212,430 over 7y, 84% of budgetCIRCLE OF LIFE — C$285,430 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetKOLEL DAF YOMI — C$265,750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetKAM SHOLOM KHM — C$221,862 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetMAHADURAS FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION — C$199,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBAIS CHOMESH — C$117,345 over 5y, 10% of budgetMESIFTA LUBAVITCH — C$90,787 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetEITZ CHAIM — C$69,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHEDER ACHAI TEMIMIM — C$64,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — C$63,486 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBAIS CHAYA MUSHKA — C$58,855 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCharityEx Foundation — C$56,690 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetGMILAT — C$52,425 over 6y, 56% of budgetTIFEERES YAAKOV — C$48,378 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCheder Chabad — C$37,823 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetJEWISH SENIOR CIRCLE — C$33,500 over 1y, 91% of budgetYESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA — C$32,450 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAGUDATH CHASIDEI CHABAD — C$25,497 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL — C$25,198 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetYESHIVAS LUBAVITCH — C$24,502 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPATHS OF TORAH SCHOOL — C$22,700 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE INTERACTIVE JEWISH EDUCATION CEN — C$15,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetNETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChabad Markham — C$5,350 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH YOUTH NETWORK — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBAYT — C$3,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAMP RIVKA LEA — C$3,220 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBNAI TORAH — C$3,100 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHABAD MONTREAL WEST — C$2,770 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCGI TORONTO — C$2,365 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHABAD OF THE BEACHES — C$1,920 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMESIVTA OHR TEMIMIM — C$1,240 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD FLAMINGO — C$990 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP PARDES CHANA — C$660 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KH MEOROTH ↗
  • Who funds MITZVAH CHARITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE OF LIFE ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL DAF YOMI ↗
  • Who funds KAM SHOLOM KHM ↗
  • Who funds MAHADURAS FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAIS CHOMESH ↗
  • Who funds MESIFTA LUBAVITCH ↗
  • Who funds GATES OF MERCY ↗
  • Who funds EITZ CHAIM ↗
  • Who funds CHEDER ACHAI TEMIMIM ↗
  • Who funds BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BAIS CHAYA MUSHKA ↗
  • Who funds CharityEx Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GMILAT ↗
  • Who funds TIFEERES YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds Cheder Chabad ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SENIOR CIRCLE ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORA ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH CHASIDEI CHABAD ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS LUBAVITCH ↗
  • Who funds PATHS OF TORAH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERACTIVE JEWISH EDUCATION CEN ↗
  • Who funds NETIVOT HATORAH DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Markham ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH YOUTH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BAYT ↗
  • Who funds CAMP RIVKA LEA ↗
  • Who funds BNAI TORAH ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD MONTREAL WEST ↗
  • Who funds CGI TORONTO ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond HillON19.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond Hill · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Chabad of Midtown · Rayjo Charitable Trust · My Charity Fund · Shmuel Zahavy Cheder Chabad School · The Estaron Foundation · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Toronto Chesed Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · CharityEx Foundation · Jewish Youth Network

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 890961782:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Tzivos Hashem Canada’s filings →