Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

London, ON · Charitable organization

Chabad at Western

Preach and advance the teachings of the jewish faith and the religious tenets doctrines observances and culture associated with that faith.

C$31k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$7k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,118
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$296k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YESHIVAS OHOLEI MENACHEM MENDEL LUBAVITCHC$7,240
BAIS CHOMESH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLSC$6,330
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE WATERLOO REGIONC$6,236
MESIVTA LUBAVITCH OF TORONTOC$5,800
CAMP GAN ISRAEL ONTARIOC$2,652
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF REGINA INCC$1,118
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF AURORA INC.C$500
CHABOT INNISFILC$360
CAMP GARDEN (GAN) OF ISRAELC$300
CHABAD OF GUELPHC$248
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SASKATATOON INC.C$118
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$177k · 15 repeat orgsC$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

C$177k
C$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+2%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$360 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • ML
    MESIVTA LUBAVITCH TORONTO
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$56k · revenue +139%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH
    3× · 2021–2023 · C$35k · revenue +306% · 39% of their budget
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SASKATOON INC.
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$17k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • JR
    JEWISH RUSSIAN SPEAKING COMMUNITY OF TORONTO
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +3%
  • LJ
    London Jewish Community Centregraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k · revenue +44%
  • CN
    CHABAD NIAGARA
    one grant, 2023 · C$690 · revenue -31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond Hill

The organization carries out religious and cultural programs to the jewish community in richmond hill and surrounding area

—
2
Chabad of Downtown Vancouver

Fostering and conducting religious jewish educating in bc

—
3
Chabad Lubavitch Society of Atlantic Canada

Education religious social recreational programs as well as further the cause and objectives of traditional judaism

—
4
Chabad on Bayview

Religious study religious school education worship

—
5
Chabad of Midtown

Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.

—
6
Chabad Lubavitch of Downtown Toronto

THE ORGANIZATION CARRIES OUT RELIGIOUS SOCIAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES FOR THE JEWISH COMMUNITY IN DOWNTOWN TORONTO Chabad runs a vibrant lineup of community programs including adult education classes Hebrew school for youth…

—
7
Institute for Lifelong Learning (Ill)

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. the organization intends to operate as an outreach organization for members of the jewish community in toronto.. it will conduct classes…

—
8
Chabad Lubavitch (Hamilton)

To provide religious and educational facilities. to provide weekly sabbath services and sabbath celebrations. to conduct holiday services and celebrations for rosh hashana yom kippur sukkoth purim and passover. to offer classes in jewish…

—
9
Canadian Friends of Lubavitch Cheder

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at lubavitch cheder

—
10
Chabad Lubavitch On the East Side
—
11
Chaverim of the Community

To promote the teachings of chabad lubavitch by establishing scholarships for persons seeking to attend schools or camps that promote those teachings. to offer support and assistance to the needy. to operate a camp for underprivileged…

—
12
Agudat Chasidei Chabad-Ontario

To promote and advance the activities beliefs and religious teachings of the orthodox Jewish movement known as Chabad Lubavitch. To publish and disseminate the educational and spiritual litterature of the Chabad Lubavitch movement and to…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chabad Lubavitch of Saskatoon Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Chabad Lubavitch of the Waterloo Region. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMESIVTA LUBAVITCH TORONTO — C$55,797 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH — C$34,697 over 3y, 39% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF SASKATOON INC. — C$17,168 over 7y, 3.7% of budgetSHMUEL ZAHAVY CHEDER CHABAD — C$13,854 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetBAIS CHOMESH HIGH SCHOOL FOR GIRLS — C$9,080 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYESHIVAS OHOLEI MENACHEM MENDEL LUBAVITCH — C$8,028 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF THE WATERLOO REGION — C$6,712 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTZIVOS HASHEM CANADA INC — C$6,460 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD ON CAMPUS CANADA — C$5,500 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCHABAD OF GUELPH — C$5,085 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF REGINA INC — C$4,808 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCAMP GAN ISRAEL ONTARIO — C$4,352 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH RUSSIAN SPEAKING COMMUNITY OF TORONTO — C$3,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChabad Lubavitch of Southern Ontario — C$2,990 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLondon Jewish Community Centre — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP GARDEN (GAN) OF ISREAEL — C$1,672 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF AURORA INC. — C$754 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD NIAGARA — C$690 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABOT INNISFIL — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD OF MAPLE INC. — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOLAM CHESED YIBONE FUND — C$118 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHABAD JEWISH CENTRE OF WOODBRIDGE — C$101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chabad of MidtownJewish NiagaraChabad Lubavitch of R…My Charity FundJewish Foundation of …Chabad of MississaugaMashiyev Family Found…CharityEx FoundationThe Estaron FoundationRayjo Charitable TrustZichron Binyomin Char…Heitner Charitable Fo…
Chabad of MidtownON19.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chabad of Midtown · Jewish Niagara · Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond Hill · My Charity Fund · Jewish Foundation of Greater Toronto · Chabad of Mississauga · Mashiyev Family Foundation · CharityEx Foundation · The Estaron Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 772550497:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Chabad at Western’s filings →