Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Outremont, QC · Private foundation

Ach Foundation

Donations to qualified donees.

C$841k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$550k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$16k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$129k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$147k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$550k
C$38,628
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTEC$549,562
ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITYC$74,284
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$72,325
HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZALC$45,284
MAHARAM TAV FUNDC$44,792
KEHILAS BELZC$38,628
CONGREGATION EITZ CHAIMC$5,262
CONGREGATION BELZC$4,500
BAIS MEDRASH HEICHAL DOVIDC$3,014
PEYLIM OF CANADAC$2,055
KOLLEL KESER TORAHC$1,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$913k · 13 repeat orgsC$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

C$913k
C$910k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-4%

Still filing today

100%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$591k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • ZC
    ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$187k · revenue +24%
  • HY
    HATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL
    3× · 2021–2024 · C$154k · revenue +10%
  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$102k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • VC
    VARIOUS - CDN AND USD
    one grant, 2022 · C$718k
  • CF
    CAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
    one grant, 2023 · C$148k · revenue -59%
  • AT
    AVREICHIM TORAH INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$20k · revenue +123%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
3
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
4
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
5
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
6
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
7
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
8
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
9
Mifal Klita

Promoted the advancement of jewish heritage culture and jewish education particularily among the underpriveledged and needy children. establish and maintain and to aid in the establishment and maintennace of schools and classes providing…

—
10
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
11
Zolty Charitable Foundation

Administered the charitable activities of the zolty family and others for the advancement of education and jewish religion and loans to the needy.

—
12
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is J & B Herzog Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$549,562 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetB'NAI LEVY FOUNDATION — C$305,183 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$187,028 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetHATZOLAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$154,402 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER — C$148,467 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$101,562 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$54,280 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER FOR HOLOCAUST STUDIES — C$52,170 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKEHILAS BELZ — C$38,628 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ — C$21,700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAVREICHIM TORAH INSTITUTE — C$20,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCONGREGATION EITZ CHAIM — C$11,477 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITÉ TZEDAKAH MONTRÉAL — C$9,424 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPEYLIM OF CANADA — C$8,804 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetLAURENTIAN JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTRE — C$5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT AISH HATORAH — C$3,374 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKOLLEL KESER TORAH — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD DE MONT-TREAMBLANT — C$2,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTIKVA CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — C$1,350 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCHAIR LIFELINE CANADA — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Herzog Family TrustHatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…Shmilu and Sari Rosen…The Friedman Family F…Rosenberg Family Foun…The F&R Hauer Charita…Heitner Charitable Fo…Michael Rosenberg Cha…The George Kohn Chari…The Micha Life Founda…Zichron David and Pes…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC10.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Herzog Family Trust · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Shmilu and Sari Rosenberg Foundation · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Michael Rosenberg Charity Foundation · The George Kohn Charitable Foundation / la Fondation Charitable George Kohn · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 724534276:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Ach’s filings →