Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $39,781 to it, the largest being CHARLES F PETERS FOUNDATION ($26,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$135k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$40k
Net assets
$113k
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What White Oak Athletic Association does

Mission

Youth sports organization

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. To promote amateur sports competition by providing necessary components for youth baseball, softball, and basketball for the community.

    $123,150 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $123,150.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($162k) Expenses 100 ($171k) Net assets 100 ($98k)2018 Revenue 75 ($121k) Expenses 72 ($122k) Net assets 99 ($97k)2019 Revenue 68 ($110k) Expenses 66 ($113k) Net assets 96 ($94k)2020 Revenue 51 ($83k) Expenses 46 ($78k) Net assets 101 ($99k)2021 Revenue 56 ($91k) Expenses 50 ($86k) Net assets 106 ($104k)2022 Revenue 79 ($128k) Expenses 82 ($139k) Net assets 95 ($93k)2023 Revenue 75 ($121k) Expenses 66 ($113k) Net assets 103 ($101k)2024 Revenue 83 ($135k) Expenses 72 ($123k) Net assets 115 ($113k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (83)Expenses (72)Net assets (115)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $101k to $113k (+11%).

$98k
$97k
$94k
$99k
$104k
$93k
$101k
$113k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 8% · 2018 25%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

8% of WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,168 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$9k
’17
−$757
’18
−$3k
’19
$5k
’20
$6k
’21
−$11k
’22
$8k
’23
$12k
’24
2.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20172018
Listed1012
Joined·+2
No longer listed·0
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $1k → $7k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2

From the IRS filings of WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 65% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

65%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 66% · 2022 82% · 2023 77% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.

PA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 15,520 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin9% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,520 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION?
WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $39,781 to it, the largest being CHARLES F PETERS FOUNDATION ($26,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $39,781 in grants to WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION?
CHARLES F PETERS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $26,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WHITE OAK ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds White Oak Athletic Association →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing