Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Indiana · Nonprofit

WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION

WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION (Indiana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,691 to it, the largest being GREATER LAFAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($12,691). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 72% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$749k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$18k
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
0/2 repeat funders

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($389k) Expenses 100 ($412k) Net assets 100 ($1.0M)2018 Revenue 161 ($626k) Expenses 138 ($567k) Net assets 106 ($1.1M)2019 Revenue 148 ($575k) Expenses 114 ($469k) Net assets 116 ($1.2M)2020 Revenue 82 ($319k) Expenses 80 ($331k) Net assets 115 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 142 ($554k) Expenses 134 ($554k) Net assets 115 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 145 ($565k) Expenses 139 ($574k) Net assets 114 ($1.2M)2023 Revenue 203 ($790k) Expenses 152 ($626k) Net assets 131 ($1.3M)2024 Revenue 181 ($704k) Expenses 147 ($605k) Net assets 140 ($1.4M)2025 Revenue 192 ($749k) Expenses 178 ($732k) Net assets 142 ($1.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (192)Expenses (178)Net assets (142)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 14% · 2018 12% · 2019 10% · 2020 17% · 2021 11% · 2022 10% · 2023 7% · 2024 11% · 2025 13%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$23k
17
$59k
18
$106k
19
$12k
20
$155
21
$9k
22
$164k
23
$99k
24
$17k
25
5.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)72% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

72% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION.

72%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

72% of WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $5k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Indiana, across 1 state.

OH

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $13k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Indiana

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

25
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION?
WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION (Indiana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,691 to it, the largest being GREATER LAFAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($12,691). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 72% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $17,691 in grants to WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION.
Who is the largest funder of WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION?
GREATER LAFAYETTE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $12,691 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WHITE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Indiana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing