Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Utah · Nonprofit

WGU LABS

WGU LABS (Utah) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $20,216,516 to it, the largest being Western Governors University ($19,158,216). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$11M
Revenue FY2023
2
Funders on record
$20M
Grants received
$0
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 72%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($229k) Expenses 100 ($4.2M) Net assets -29 ($-979498)2020 Revenue 2448 ($5.6M) Expenses 318 ($13M) Net assets -261 ($-8734489)2021 Revenue 7504 ($17M) Expenses 313 ($13M) Net assets 100 ($3.3M)2022 Revenue 4788 ($11M) Expenses 170 ($7.2M) Net assets 227 ($7.6M)2023 Revenue 4793 ($11M) Expenses 206 ($8.7M) Net assets 0 ($0)
20192020202120222023
Revenue (4793)Expenses (206)Net assets (0)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 21% · 2020 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$4.0M
19
$7.8M
20
$4.0M
21
$3.8M
22
$2.3M
23
0.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2021 → 2022: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $12M → $7.9M.

Funder
'21
'22
total
funders
2
1

From the IRS filings of WGU LABS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.

How concentrated its funding is

WGU LABS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 95% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

95%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 91% · 2022 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.

Where its funders are

100% of WGU LABS's grant income comes from Utah funders.

UT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like WGU LABS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

62% of spending goes to programs.

Program 62%Management 30%Fundraising 8%

Governance

5
board members
40%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

91%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

UT

Part of a family of 7 related entities

  • Wgu Labs Management LLC · disregarded
  • Wgu Labs General Partnership LLC · disregarded
  • WGU Corporation · exempt
  • Western Governors University · exempt
  • Wgu Advancement · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WGU LABS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WGU LABS?
WGU LABS (Utah) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $20,216,516 to it, the largest being Western Governors University ($19,158,216). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does WGU LABS have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $20,216,516 in grants to WGU LABS, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WGU LABS?
Western Governors University is the largest funder on record, with $19,158,216 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WGU LABS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2019–2023), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing