Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT

WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $36,250 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($31,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 86% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$288k
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$36k
Grants received
$137k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funders

Against its field

WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT has grown faster than three-quarters of the 7,105 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Operating margin7% · below the median
Months of reserve6.1mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)20% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,105 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($82k) Expenses 100 ($51k) Net assets 100 ($64k)2018 Revenue 94 ($77k) Expenses 115 ($59k) Net assets 129 ($82k)2019 Revenue 94 ($77k) Expenses 126 ($64k) Net assets 0 ($0)2020 Revenue 104 ($85k) Expenses 132 ($67k) Net assets 112 ($72k)2021 Revenue 172 ($141k) Expenses 221 ($112k) Net assets 157 ($100k)2022 Revenue 185 ($151k) Expenses 317 ($161k) Net assets 141 ($90k)2023 Revenue 237 ($194k) Expenses 326 ($166k) Net assets 185 ($118k)2024 Revenue 352 ($288k) Expenses 530 ($269k) Net assets 214 ($137k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (352)Expenses (530)Net assets (214)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,816 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$31k
17
$19k
18
$13k
19
$18k
20
$29k
21
$10k
22
$28k
23
$19k
24
6.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)86% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 86% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT.

86%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

86% of WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $5k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Texas, across 1 state.

MI

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $31k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT?
WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $36,250 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($31,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 86% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $36,250 in grants to WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT.
Who is the largest funder of WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $31,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WELLSPRING ENDOWMENT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing