Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

VOTING PROJECT

VOTING PROJECT (Michigan) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,283,000 to it, the largest being Road to Michigan's Future ($538,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$299k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$1.3M
Net assets
$3k
1/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 62%
01What it does

What Voting Project does

Mission

To increase voter participation and turnout amongst underrepresented communities.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Direct mail program to turn out voters in underrepresented communities. Sent out more than 200,000 direct mail postcards to americans in underrepresented communities providing voting information and encouraging voters to carry out their civic duty.

    $191,978 spent
    66% of program spending
  2. Sent out 80,000+ peer-to-peer text messages to engage potential voters on key issues and increase voter turnout among underrepresented communities in michigan.

    $99,684 spent
    34% of program spending
  3. Used what we learned from past tactics experiments for civic engagement and communicated those findings via email, peer-to-peer texts and more to support digital and direct mail programs aimed at turning out voters in underrepresented communities.

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $291,662.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($232k) Expenses 100 ($227k) Net assets 100 ($5k)2020 Revenue 523 ($1.2M) Expenses 514 ($1.2M) Net assets 938 ($47k)2022 Revenue 90 ($209k) Expenses 86 ($195k) Net assets 489 ($24k)2023 Revenue 70 ($162k) Expenses 81 ($185k) Net assets 23 ($1k)2024 Revenue 129 ($299k) Expenses 131 ($296k) Net assets 68 ($3k)
20182020202220232024
Revenue (129)Expenses (131)Net assets (68)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $24k to $1k (−95%).

$5k
$47k
$24k
$1k
$3k
20182020202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2020
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$5k
’18
$47k
’20
$14k
’22
−$23k
’23
$2k
’24
0.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2018202020222024
Listed5535
Joined····
No longer listed····
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $125k → $350k.

Funder
'18
'20
'21
'24*
total
$538k
$125k
funders
1
2
1
1

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 21% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of VOTING PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

VOTING PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 42% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund VOTING PROJECT.

42%
largest funder
90%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 64% · 2021 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

65% of VOTING PROJECT's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’20
’21
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $270k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like VOTING PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for VOTING PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds VOTING PROJECT?
VOTING PROJECT (Michigan) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,283,000 to it, the largest being Road to Michigan's Future ($538,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does VOTING PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $1,283,000 in grants to VOTING PROJECT, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of VOTING PROJECT?
Road to Michigan's Future is the largest funder on record, with $538,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like VOTING PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Voting Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing