Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY (New York) is funded by 62 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $2,159,689 in grants to it, the largest being CARL E TOUHEY FOUNDATION ($1,000,000). 34 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 21,488 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,488 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2023
The base broadened — 4 funders to 5 as grant income moved $28k → $127k.
1 of 62 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 62 funders by total. Association, not causation.
UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 46% of grant income and the top three 71%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 54% · 2018 25% · 2019 73% · 2020 75% · 2021 62% · 2022 34% · 2023 32% · 2024 36% · 2025 74% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
18% of UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
UNIVERSITY AT ALBANY is locally rooted: 86% of its grant income comes from New York funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 62 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
78% of spending goes to programs.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2023–2023), and the filings of 62funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing