Loading…
Loading…
Missouri · Nonprofit
UNITED WAY OF ST FRANCOIS COUNTY (Missouri) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $131,405 in grants to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ($55,906). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
UNITED WAY OF ST FRANCOIS COUNTY's revenue fell 29% between 2018 and 2025.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,442 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
66% of UNITED WAY OF ST FRANCOIS COUNTY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (87% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$6k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $29k and 3 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of UNITED WAY OF ST FRANCOIS COUNTY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
UNITED WAY OF ST FRANCOIS COUNTY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 62% · 2019 59% · 2020 80% · 2021 55% · 2022 71% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
UNITED WAY OF ST FRANCOIS COUNTY is locally rooted: 69% of its grant income comes from Missouri funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing