New York · Nonprofit
UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC
UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $220,383 to it, the largest being National Trust for Historic Preservation In the United States ($100,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 14,813 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,813 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- New York Landmarks Conservancy Incshared fundersportfolio match
- Lily Auchincloss Foundation Incshared fundersportfolio match
- The University of the Artsshared funders
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Who funds it, year by year
2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $20k → $100k.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 55% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 77% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
55% of UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $100k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside New York, across 1 state.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $120k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- New York Landmarks Conservancy Incshared fundersportfolio matchNY · backs 13 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Lily Auchincloss Foundation Incshared fundersportfolio matchNY · backs 8 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- The University of the Artsshared fundersPA · backs 8 organizations that share your funders
- New York City Tourism Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- City Parks Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Jeanne & Thomas Hardy Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- New York Universityportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No 9portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Citizens Committee for New York City Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Realty Foundation of New York Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Michael Tuch Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Henry and Lucy Moses Fund Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In New York
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC?
- UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC (New York) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $220,383 to it, the largest being National Trust for Historic Preservation In the United States ($100,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 55% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $220,383 in grants to UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC?
- National Trust for Historic Preservation In the United States is the largest funder on record, with $100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like UNITED ORDER OF TENTS OF BROOKLYN OF THE EASTERN DISTRICT NO 3 (JRG A AND JU) INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing