Loading…
Loading…
Georgia · Nonprofit
TUTTLE NEWTON HOME INC (Georgia) is funded by 13 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $484,044 in grants to it, the largest being CREEL-HARISON FOUNDATION INC ($155,000). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
TUTTLE NEWTON HOME INC has grown faster than half of the 6,570 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,570 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$17k from 3 funders in 2025, up from $21k and 5 in 2017.
1 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of TUTTLE NEWTON HOME INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
TUTTLE NEWTON HOME INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 32% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 49% · 2018 34% · 2019 20% · 2020 30% · 2021 38% · 2022 34% · 2023 41% · 2024 59% · 2025 46% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
67% of TUTTLE NEWTON HOME INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 77% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
TUTTLE NEWTON HOME INC is locally rooted: 99% of its grant income comes from Georgia funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 13 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 13funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing