Loading…
Loading…
Ohio · Nonprofit
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOC (Ohio) is funded by 1 grantmaker whose IRS filings report $21,880 in grants to it, the largest being REEVES FOUNDATION ($21,880). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 462 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 462 recreation & sports nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2025 1%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
36% of TUSCARAWAS COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (13% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
$8k from 1 funders in 2022, up from $14k and 1 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of TUSCARAWAS COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Ohio funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
97% of spending goes to programs.
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2024–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing