Loading…
Loading…
South Carolina · Nonprofit
THE SUSAN MORROW LEGACY FOUNDATION (South Carolina) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $5,500 in grants to it, the largest being THE DAVID AND LEILA CARPENTER FOUNDATION ($2,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE SUSAN MORROW LEGACY FOUNDATION is funded by 4 grantmakers reporting $6k in grants to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,570 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$1k from 1 funders in 2023, up from $5k and 3 in 2022.
From the IRS filings of THE SUSAN MORROW LEGACY FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
THE SUSAN MORROW LEGACY FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 82%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 56% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
THE SUSAN MORROW LEGACY FOUNDATION draws 82% of its grant income from funders outside South Carolina — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 4 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing