Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Ohio · Nonprofit

THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC

THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC (Ohio) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being THE MFG FOUNDATION CO ($45,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$3.8M
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$60k
Grants received
$25M
Net assets
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%

Against its field

THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC has grown faster than three-quarters of the 1,336 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve7.5mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)33% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,336 philanthropy nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($897k) Expenses 100 ($798k) Net assets 100 ($20M)2021 Revenue 286 ($2.6M) Expenses 151 ($1.2M) Net assets 110 ($22M)2022 Revenue 90 ($803k) Expenses 131 ($1.0M) Net assets 96 ($19M)2023 Revenue 175 ($1.6M) Expenses 159 ($1.3M) Net assets 111 ($22M)2024 Revenue 225 ($2.0M) Expenses 187 ($1.5M) Net assets 119 ($23M)2025 Revenue 421 ($3.8M) Expenses 154 ($1.2M) Net assets 127 ($25M)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (421)Expenses (154)Net assets (127)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $10k → $35k.

From the IRS filings of THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 75% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

75%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC's grant income comes from Ohio funders.

OH

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 98 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC?
THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC (Ohio) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being THE MFG FOUNDATION CO ($45,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $60,000 in grants to THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC?
THE MFG FOUNDATION CO is the largest funder on record, with $45,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE ASHTABULA FOUNDATION INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing