Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
TENDER LOVING MERCY INC (California) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $23,622 in grants to it, the largest being HELPING HANDS GRANT FOUNDATION ($23,622). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
TENDER LOVING MERCY INC's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 2 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,383 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $0 → $24k.
From the IRS filings of TENDER LOVING MERCY INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 1 of 2 funders by total. Association, not causation.
TENDER LOVING MERCY INC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from California funders.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
0%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing