California · Nonprofit
STAND WITH UKRAINE
STAND WITH UKRAINE (California) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $794,905 to it, the largest being The Dell Loy Hansen Foundation ($710,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The Rees-Jones Foundationshared funders
- The Selfreliance Foundationportfolio match
- The Maria Hulai Lion Foundation Incportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
2022 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income rose $35k → $745k.
1 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of STAND WITH UKRAINE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
STAND WITH UKRAINE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 89% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 83% · 2023 95% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
STAND WITH UKRAINE draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 6 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $10k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- The Rees-Jones Foundationshared fundersTX · backs 23 organizations that share your funders
- The Selfreliance Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Maria Hulai Lion Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Heritage Foundation of First Security Federal Savings Bank Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- UMANA Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ukrainian Community Foundation of Philadelphiaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ukrainian American Community (Uac) Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lifting Hands Internationalportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Pledges Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- U S-Ukraine Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Hello Neighborportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Choose Love Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like STAND WITH UKRAINE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
0%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for STAND WITH UKRAINE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds STAND WITH UKRAINE?
- STAND WITH UKRAINE (California) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $794,905 to it, the largest being The Dell Loy Hansen Foundation ($710,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does STAND WITH UKRAINE have?
- IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $794,905 in grants to STAND WITH UKRAINE.
- Who is the largest funder of STAND WITH UKRAINE?
- The Dell Loy Hansen Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $710,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like STAND WITH UKRAINE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2025–2025), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing