Loading…
Loading…
Texas · Nonprofit
STAND IN THE GAP (Texas) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,000 in grants to it, the largest being John P & Kathryn G Evans Foundation ($600). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
STAND IN THE GAP is funded by 4 grantmakers reporting $1k in grants to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,613 crime & legal nonprofits under $100k, FY2023
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of STAND IN THE GAP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
STAND IN THE GAP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 90%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
STAND IN THE GAP draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Texas — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 3 states in all.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 261 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2023–2023), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing