Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
SLEEPY HOLLOW SPRINT TRIALTHOLON INC (New York) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,250 in grants to it, the largest being EAST COAST ENERGY FOUNDATION INC ($1,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
SLEEPY HOLLOW SPRINT TRIALTHOLON INC has grown faster than half of the 6,751 philanthropy nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,751 philanthropy nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of SLEEPY HOLLOW SPRINT TRIALTHOLON INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (38% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $250 → $1k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of SLEEPY HOLLOW SPRINT TRIALTHOLON INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
SLEEPY HOLLOW SPRINT TRIALTHOLON INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 80% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
SLEEPY HOLLOW SPRINT TRIALTHOLON INC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from New York funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
0% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing