Oregon · Nonprofit
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (Oregon) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $445,161 to it, the largest being Philadelphia Hospitality Investment Levy ($200,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- City First Enterprises Inclocal
- Service Employees' Local No 1portfolio match
- Unite Hereportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2020: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $75k → $170k.
From the IRS filings of SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
How concentrated its funding is
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 45% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 58% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Where its funders are
55% of SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION's grant income comes from Oregon funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- City First Enterprises InclocalDC · funds 1035 organizations near you
- Service Employees' Local No 1portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Unite Hereportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Service Employees International Union Local No 99portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Service Employees International Union Healthcare Minnesota and Iowaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Minnesota Nurses Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Food and Commercial Workers International Unionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Office and Professional Employees International Unionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizationsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Neca-Ibew National Labor-Management Cooperation Committee Trust Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- International Assn of Bridge Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Oregon
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Part of a family of 4 related entities
- Oregon State Council · exempt
- Citizen Action for Political · exempt
- The Building Corporation of Seiu · exempt
- Forum Building LLC · partnership
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION?
- SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (Oregon) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $445,161 to it, the largest being Philadelphia Hospitality Investment Levy ($200,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $445,161 in grants to SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION?
- Philadelphia Hospitality Investment Levy is the largest funder on record, with $200,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing