Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Oregon · Nonprofit

RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER

RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER (Oregon) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $74,900 to it, the largest being The Oregon Community Foundation ($49,900). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$379k
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$75k
Grants received
$38k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funders

Against its field

RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,269 employment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−7% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve3.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)62% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,269 employment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20232023 Revenue 100 ($233k) Expenses 100 ($167k) Net assets 100 ($66k)2024 Revenue 162 ($379k) Expenses 244 ($406k) Net assets 58 ($38k)
20232024
Revenue (162)Expenses (244)Net assets (58)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

35% of RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (54% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,317 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.

$66k
23
$28k
24
3.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

67% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER.

67%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

67% of RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $25k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Oregon funders.

OR

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $50k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $251k on record.

State$251k
Top programs
  • DISTRIBUTION TO FOR-PROFIT SUBRECIPIENT$248k
  • OTHER SERVICES$3k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 15%Fundraising 1%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER?
RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER (Oregon) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $74,900 to it, the largest being The Oregon Community Foundation ($49,900). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $74,900 in grants to RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER.
Who is the largest funder of RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER?
The Oregon Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $49,900 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RURAL ENGAGEMENT AND VITALITY CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2023–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing