Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS

REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $31,500 to it, the largest being ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ($31,500). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2026
$2.2M
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$32k
Net assets
$3.1M
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Redwood City 1991 Bpo Elks does

Mission

The mission of the elks fraternity is to help elks build stronger communities by investing in communities where elks live and work. The elks provide tomorrows leaders and a healthy beginning for our youth; honor the elks pledge to never forget our veterans; help the state elks

As stated on its FY2026 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Social, charitable and fraternal activities

    $1,071,955 spent$136,445 earned by the program
    73% of program spending
  2. Olympic heated swimming pool providing enjoyment to members and guests. Lifeguards on on duty daily during the summer season.

    $209,467 spent$142,916 earned by the program
    14% of program spending
  3. Nine hole golf course. Providing enjoyment to the general public along with junior golf camps to children ages 5 to 14.

    $180,311 spent$272,468 earned by the program
    12% of program spending
  4. Bar and golf inventory sales

    $162,015 earned by the program
  5. Lodge rental activities including facilities rental and wireless tower rental.

    $131,623 earned by the program

The 5 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,461,733.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($1.2M) Net assets 100 ($2.7M)2018 Revenue 94 ($1.2M) Expenses 110 ($1.3M) Net assets 97 ($2.6M)2019 Revenue 104 ($1.4M) Expenses 125 ($1.5M) Net assets 92 ($2.5M)2020 Revenue 113 ($1.5M) Expenses 135 ($1.6M) Net assets 87 ($2.4M)2021 Revenue 91 ($1.2M) Expenses 97 ($1.2M) Net assets 89 ($2.4M)2022 Revenue 111 ($1.5M) Expenses 119 ($1.4M) Net assets 90 ($2.4M)2023 Revenue 118 ($1.6M) Expenses 142 ($1.7M) Net assets 83 ($2.3M)2024 Revenue 150 ($2.0M) Expenses 138 ($1.7M) Net assets 99 ($2.7M)2025 Revenue 183 ($2.4M) Expenses 190 ($2.3M) Net assets 105 ($2.8M)2026 Revenue 168 ($2.2M) Expenses 172 ($2.1M) Net assets 115 ($3.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (168)Expenses (172)Net assets (115)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2025 to 2026, from $3.5M to $4.2M (+17%).

$3.0M
$2.9M
$2.7M
$2.6M
$2.7M
$2.8M
$2.7M
$3.1M
$3.5M
$4.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 10 reported years ran a deficit.

$120k
’17
−$78k
’18
−$126k
’19
−$135k
’20
$43k
’21
$37k
’22
−$144k
’23
$330k
’24
$137k
’25
$150k
’26
4.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Listed15151617161818181616
Joined·+0+10+3+4+7+0+3+5+4
No longer listed·092550374
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'23
'24*
'25*
'26*
total
funders
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 1 state in all.

IL

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Governance

11
board members
45%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS?
REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $31,500 to it, the largest being ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ($31,500). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $31,500 in grants to REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS?
ELKS NATIONAL FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $31,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like REDWOOD CITY 1991 BPO ELKS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Redwood City 1991 Bpo Elks →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing