Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Red-White and Blue Charity

Red-White and Blue Charity (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $42,500 to it, the largest being DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ($30,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2019
$60k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$43k
Net assets
$0
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 46%
01What it does

What Red-White and Blue Charity does

Mission

The mission is to feed the homeless, Housed the homeless and provide social work services to the mental illness clients

As stated on its FY2019 Form 990.

Program

Office Space Shelter Internet Insurance Automobile expenses Internet Gas/Travel

The first program described on its most recent Form 990, which lists programs largest first by expense.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($39k) Expenses 100 ($40k) Net assets 100 ($300)2018 Revenue 147 ($57k) Expenses 135 ($54k) Net assets 1228 ($4k)2019 Revenue 153 ($60k) Expenses 145 ($58k) Net assets 0 ($0)
201720182019
Revenue (153)Expenses (145)Net assets (0)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $300 to $4k (+1128%).

$300
$4k
$3k
201720182019
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of Red-White and Blue Charity’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,498 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

−$995
’17
$3k
’18
$2k
’19
0.6
months of
reserve
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2019: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $3k → $13k.

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Red-White and Blue Charity’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Red-White and Blue Charity leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

86% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Red-White and Blue Charity.

71%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 75% · 2019 77% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Red-White and Blue Charity draws 83% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 2 states in all.

CA
MD

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Red-White and Blue Charity has grown faster than three-quarters of the 9,300 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Months of reserve0.6mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)24% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,300 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2019

Government funding Red-White and Blue Charity receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $17k on record.

Federal$17k
grants $17kcontracts $0
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$17k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Red-White and Blue Charity

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 0%Fundraising 10%

Governance

0
board members
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Red-White and Blue Charity: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Red-White and Blue Charity?
Red-White and Blue Charity (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $42,500 to it, the largest being DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION ($30,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Red-White and Blue Charity have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $42,500 in grants to Red-White and Blue Charity, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Red-White and Blue Charity?
DISABLED VETERANS NATIONAL FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $30,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Red-White and Blue Charity find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Red-White and Blue Charity →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2019 (financials across 2017–2019), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing