Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Illinois · Nonprofit

PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU

PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU (Illinois) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $227,411 to it, the largest being Illinois Agricultural Association ($203,181). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$270k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$227k
Grants received
$525k
Net assets
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 21%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($159k) Expenses 100 ($155k) Net assets 100 ($237k)2018 Revenue 106 ($169k) Expenses 106 ($164k) Net assets 102 ($243k)2019 Revenue 102 ($163k) Expenses 94 ($146k) Net assets 109 ($259k)2020 Revenue 107 ($171k) Expenses 81 ($126k) Net assets 129 ($305k)2021 Revenue 108 ($173k) Expenses 78 ($120k) Net assets 151 ($357k)2022 Revenue 103 ($165k) Expenses 99 ($154k) Net assets 149 ($352k)2023 Revenue 121 ($192k) Expenses 105 ($163k) Net assets 161 ($382k)2024 Revenue 134 ($213k) Expenses 122 ($189k) Net assets 173 ($410k)2025 Revenue 170 ($270k) Expenses 101 ($157k) Net assets 222 ($525k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (170)Expenses (101)Net assets (222)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$4k
17
$6k
18
$17k
19
$46k
20
$52k
21
$11k
22
$30k
23
$25k
24
$113k
25
12
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $25k → $9k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)11% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU leans on a few funders — its largest provides 89% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU.

89%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 68% · 2018 77% · 2019 76% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU's grant income comes from Illinois funders.

IL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $24k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you well-backed among the 139 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Pulaski-Alexander County Farm Bureau Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU?
PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU (Illinois) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $227,411 to it, the largest being Illinois Agricultural Association ($203,181). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $227,411 in grants to PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU?
Illinois Agricultural Association is the largest funder on record, with $203,181 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PULASKI-ALEXANDER FARM BUREAU find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing