Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Prospect Silicon Valley

Prospect Silicon Valley (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $325,000 to it, the largest being The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc ($215,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.1M
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$325k
Net assets
$491k
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What Prospect Silicon Valley does

Mission

The purpose of the organization is to advance progress in sustainability and decarbonization of energy, transportation, and infrastructure.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. For more information please visit www.prospectsv.org/our-workBuilding Decarbonization Policy SupportProspectSV is supporting nationwide policy research with LBNL, to characterize howindustry tools, services, programs, and finance may or may not support compliancewith Building Performance Standards (BPS) for smaller buildings and small portfolios.Our work includes researching BPS-relevant software tools for owners of underservedbuildings who have limited resources and internal expertise. Activities under thistask include conducting outreach and interviews with product providers, developingoverviews of capabilities and benefits of products reviewed, and distributing resultsin a snapshot analysis to target audiences. Also, ProspectSV is conducting alandscape study of financing mechanisms related to decarbonization investments forsmall businesses and under-served buildings, with a focus on building performancestandard compliance and electrification. In addition, ProspectSV is engaging BPSstakeholder working groups that will help inform LBNLs BPS Policy TechnicalAssistance efforts by identifying specific building owner needs. We engage owners,capital entities, and other CRE…

    $579,452 spent$1,061,542 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $579,452.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.0M) Expenses 100 ($1.1M) Net assets 100 ($218k)2018 Revenue 116 ($1.2M) Expenses 135 ($1.4M) Net assets 119 ($260k)2019 Revenue 158 ($1.6M) Expenses 153 ($1.6M) Net assets 93 ($203k)2020 Revenue 135 ($1.4M) Expenses 133 ($1.4M) Net assets 82 ($178k)2021 Revenue 106 ($1.1M) Expenses 97 ($1.0M) Net assets 110 ($239k)2022 Revenue 86 ($889k) Expenses 78 ($834k) Net assets 135 ($294k)2023 Revenue 109 ($1.1M) Expenses 79 ($846k) Net assets 266 ($578k)2024 Revenue 69 ($718k) Expenses 79 ($838k) Net assets 211 ($459k)2025 Revenue 103 ($1.1M) Expenses 97 ($1.0M) Net assets 225 ($491k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (103)Expenses (97)Net assets (225)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.1M to $847k (−59%).

$1.2M
$624k
$1.6M
$2.1M
$847k
$610k
$826k
$536k
$1.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 12% · 2022 15%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

0% of Prospect Silicon Valley’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (61% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,434 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$31k
’17
−$229k
’18
$4k
’19
−$24k
’20
$61k
’21
$55k
’22
$284k
’23
−$119k
’24
$32k
’25
9.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Gordon Ho

Chairman/Sec.

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2017 and FY2018, and between the FY2019 and FY2020 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed666764898
Joined·+2+0+2+3+0+4+3+0
No longer listed·20142021
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $50k → $30k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
total
Nextenergy Centerunclassified
$50k
funders
1
3
1
1
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Prospect Silicon Valley’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Prospect Silicon Valley leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

34% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Prospect Silicon Valley.

66%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 38% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Prospect Silicon Valley draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 2 states in all.

MI
NC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $60k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Prospect Silicon Valley is better cushioned than half of the 2,127 community improvement nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Months of reserve9.3mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)0% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,127 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like Prospect Silicon Valley

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

56% of spending goes to programs.

Program 56%Management 44%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Prospect Silicon Valley: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Prospect Silicon Valley?
Prospect Silicon Valley (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $325,000 to it, the largest being The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc ($215,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Prospect Silicon Valley have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $325,000 in grants to Prospect Silicon Valley, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Prospect Silicon Valley?
The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc is the largest funder on record, with $215,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Prospect Silicon Valley find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Prospect Silicon Valley →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing