Skip to content

Utah · Nonprofit

PROJECT APIS M INC

PROJECT APIS M INC (Utah) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $55,300 to it, the largest being THE SHILLING FAMILY FOUNDATION ($40,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.3M
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$55k
Net assets
$1.8M
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Project Apis M Inc does

Mission

The organization's mission is to fund and direct research and efforts to improve honey bee health and vitality.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Research funding project apis m., inc. Is the go-to organization at the interface of honey bees and pollinated crops. Since 2006, the organization has infused over 13 million into honey bee research to provide healthier bees, resulting in better pollination and increased crop yields for the grower, and lower losses and better honey production for the beekeeper. Project apis m. Works closely with commercial beekeepers, growers, and top bee scientists in the usa and canada to direct strategic research efforts focused on practical solutions. (continued on schedule o.)

    $920,601 spentof which $920,601 as grants$115,825 earned by the program
    48% of program spending
  2. Pam research varroa mites occur in all u.s. Honey bee colonies and typically kill or damage bees if not controlled. The mites are managed with in-hive chemical treatments, but there are problems associated with this approach. A desirable alternative is to use bees that have genetically based mite resistance. The organizations project, managed by a public-private partnership, is breeding and improving a population of hilo bees that has significant resistance to varroa. As the population stabilizes, we are carefully testing initial introductions to the commercial bee keeping industry.

    $315,724 spentof which $15,084 as grants
    17% of program spending
  3. Seeds for bees seeds for bees encourages the use of cover crops to increase the density, diversity, and duration of bee forage in california orchards, farms, and vineyards, while improving soil health. The seed mixes available through seeds for bees are designed to bloom at critical times of the year when natural forage is scarce but managed and native bees are active. Seeds for bees serves the needs of bees, beekeepers, and growers, increasing sustainability of pollination and agriculture. In fy25, the seeds for bees program worked with 414 california growers to plant over 26,000 acres of cover crop.

    $675,592 spentof which $450,944 as grants
    35% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,911,917.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.7M) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2018 Revenue 99 ($1.7M) Expenses 102 ($1.7M) Net assets 134 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 106 ($1.8M) Expenses 99 ($1.7M) Net assets 116 ($1.4M)2020 Revenue 99 ($1.7M) Expenses 83 ($1.4M) Net assets 144 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 186 ($3.2M) Expenses 123 ($2.1M) Net assets 243 ($2.9M)2022 Revenue 113 ($2.0M) Expenses 110 ($1.8M) Net assets 254 ($3.1M)2023 Revenue 94 ($1.6M) Expenses 151 ($2.5M) Net assets 181 ($2.2M)2024 Revenue 116 ($2.0M) Expenses 143 ($2.4M) Net assets 151 ($1.8M)2025 Revenue 132 ($2.3M) Expenses 139 ($2.3M) Net assets 150 ($1.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (132)Expenses (139)Net assets (150)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.1M to $3.1M (+50%).

$1.5M
$1.7M
$1.8M
$2.1M
$3.1M
$3.2M
$2.4M
$1.9M
$2.0M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 7% · 2018 6% · 2019 17% · 2020 7% · 2021 1% · 2022 4% · 2023 12% · 2024 20% · 2025 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of PROJECT APIS M INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,195 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$72k
’17
$15k
’18
$191k
’19
$335k
’20
$1.2M
’21
$141k
’22
−$882k
’23
−$368k
’24
−$10k
’25
10
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Zac Browning

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed11911121312121313
Joined·+2+2+1+1+1+1+1+2
No longer listed·40002102
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $10k → $10k.

From the IRS filings of PROJECT APIS M INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJECT APIS M INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

72%
largest funder
89%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 57% · 2022 83% · 2023 97% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PROJECT APIS M INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Utah, across 6 states in all.

MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PROJECT APIS M INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 605 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−0% · below the median
Months of reserve10.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 605 food & nutrition nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding PROJECT APIS M INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $430k on record.

Federal$430k
grants $394kcontracts $35k
18
19
21
22
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$430k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PROJECT APIS M INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 13%Fundraising 4%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 11 states

MN
WI
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
KS
NC
GA
FL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Bee Health Collective · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT APIS M INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJECT APIS M INC?
PROJECT APIS M INC (Utah) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $55,300 to it, the largest being THE SHILLING FAMILY FOUNDATION ($40,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PROJECT APIS M INC have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $55,300 in grants to PROJECT APIS M INC, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJECT APIS M INC?
THE SHILLING FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $40,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJECT APIS M INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing