Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Utah · Nonprofit

PROJECT APIS M INC

PROJECT APIS M INC (Utah) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $55,300 to it, the largest being THE SHILLING FAMILY FOUNDATION ($40,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$2.3M
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$55k
Grants received
$1.8M
Net assets
3/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Against its field

PROJECT APIS M INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 505 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−0% · below the median
Months of reserve10.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 505 food & nutrition nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.7M) Expenses 100 ($1.7M) Net assets 100 ($1.2M)2018 Revenue 99 ($1.7M) Expenses 102 ($1.7M) Net assets 134 ($1.6M)2019 Revenue 106 ($1.8M) Expenses 99 ($1.7M) Net assets 116 ($1.4M)2020 Revenue 99 ($1.7M) Expenses 83 ($1.4M) Net assets 144 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 186 ($3.2M) Expenses 123 ($2.1M) Net assets 243 ($2.9M)2022 Revenue 113 ($2.0M) Expenses 110 ($1.8M) Net assets 254 ($3.1M)2023 Revenue 94 ($1.6M) Expenses 151 ($2.5M) Net assets 181 ($2.2M)2024 Revenue 116 ($2.0M) Expenses 143 ($2.4M) Net assets 151 ($1.8M)2025 Revenue 132 ($2.3M) Expenses 139 ($2.3M) Net assets 150 ($1.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (132)Expenses (139)Net assets (150)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 7% · 2018 6% · 2019 17% · 2020 7% · 2021 1% · 2022 4% · 2023 12% · 2024 20% · 2025 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

93% of PROJECT APIS M INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (93% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,189 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$72k
17
$15k
18
$191k
19
$335k
20
$1.2M
21
$141k
22
$882k
23
$368k
24
$10k
25
10
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $10k → $10k.

From the IRS filings of PROJECT APIS M INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROJECT APIS M INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

72%
largest funder
89%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 57% · 2022 83% · 2023 97%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PROJECT APIS M INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Utah, across 6 states in all.

MA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
21
22
23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 326 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding PROJECT APIS M INC receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $430k on record.

Federal$430k
grants $394kcontracts $35k
18
19
21
22
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$430k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like PROJECT APIS M INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 13%Fundraising 4%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 11 states

MN
WI
OR
PA
NJ
CA
VA
KS
NC
GA
FL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Bee Health Collective · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROJECT APIS M INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROJECT APIS M INC?
PROJECT APIS M INC (Utah) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $55,300 to it, the largest being THE SHILLING FAMILY FOUNDATION ($40,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PROJECT APIS M INC have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $55,300 in grants to PROJECT APIS M INC, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROJECT APIS M INC?
THE SHILLING FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $40,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROJECT APIS M INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing