Washington · Nonprofit
Pro-Choice Washington
Pro-Choice Washington (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $232,800 to it, the largest being Washington Progress Alliance ($120,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Grove Action Fundshared funders
- Reproductive Freedom for Allportfolio match
- Reproductive Freedom for All Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $700 → $50k.
2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Pro-Choice Washington’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Pro-Choice Washington leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
91% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Pro-Choice Washington.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 71% · 2018 71% · 2019 100% · 2022 75% · 2023 60% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of Pro-Choice Washington's grant income comes from Washington funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $61k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Grove Action Fundshared fundersCA · backs 25 organizations that share your funders
- Reproductive Freedom for Allportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Reproductive Freedom for All Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Service Employees International Union Local 775portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Washington Progress Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Noise for Nowportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ordinary People Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Washington Federation of State Employeesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Apiary for Practical Support Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Planned Parenthood Action Fund Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Legal Foundation of Washingtonportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Planned Parenthood Federation of America Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Pro-Choice Washington
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
36% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Part of a family of 1 related entity
- Pro-Choice Washington Foundation · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Pro-Choice Washington: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Pro-Choice Washington?
- Pro-Choice Washington (Washington) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $232,800 to it, the largest being Washington Progress Alliance ($120,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Pro-Choice Washington have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $232,800 in grants to Pro-Choice Washington, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Pro-Choice Washington?
- Washington Progress Alliance is the largest funder on record, with $120,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Pro-Choice Washington find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing