Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

South Dakota · Nonprofit

PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY

PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY (South Dakota) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $1,029,055 to it, the largest being WESTHILLS VILLAGE FOUNDATION ($1,029,055). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$31M
Revenue FY2025
1
Funders on record
$1.0M
Grants received
$95M
Net assets
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($20M) Expenses 100 ($17M) Net assets 100 ($43M)2018 Revenue 108 ($22M) Expenses 108 ($18M) Net assets 107 ($46M)2019 Revenue 112 ($23M) Expenses 116 ($20M) Net assets 116 ($50M)2020 Revenue 130 ($26M) Expenses 116 ($20M) Net assets 135 ($58M)2021 Revenue 135 ($27M) Expenses 128 ($22M) Net assets 161 ($69M)2022 Revenue 129 ($26M) Expenses 143 ($24M) Net assets 135 ($58M)2023 Revenue 138 ($28M) Expenses 137 ($23M) Net assets 156 ($67M)2024 Revenue 160 ($32M) Expenses 142 ($24M) Net assets 198 ($85M)2025 Revenue 154 ($31M) Expenses 144 ($25M) Net assets 221 ($95M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (154)Expenses (144)Net assets (221)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 12% · 2022 1% · 2023 10% · 2024 0% · 2025 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$3.2M
17
$3.4M
18
$2.8M
19
$6.5M
20
$5.6M
21
$1.7M
22
$4.6M
23
$8.1M
24
$6.5M
25
0.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $42k → $80k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.

Where its funders are

100% of PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY's grant income comes from South Dakota funders.

SD

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
South Dakota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Dakota

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 17%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

92%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Westhills Village Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY?
PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY (South Dakota) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $1,029,055 to it, the largest being WESTHILLS VILLAGE FOUNDATION ($1,029,055). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $1,029,055 in grants to PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY?
WESTHILLS VILLAGE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,029,055 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT VILLAGE OF RAPID CITY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing