Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES
PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $147,000 to it, the largest being BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT AFL-CIO ($140,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $50k
- Funders on record
- 2
- Grants received
- $147k
- Net assets
- $203k
What Plan for the Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes does
Mission
The exempt purpose is to render of obtain jurisdictional dispute resolution for labor organizations involved in the building and construction trades, using all available means to resolve job-site disputes effectively
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.
Program
The exempt purpose is to render or obtain jurisdictional dispute resolutions for labor organizations.
$0 spent
The program described on its FY2023 Form 990-EZ.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $188k to $136k (−28%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Leadership and staff
Board chair
Sean Mcgarvey
Chairman
As listed on its FY2023 Form 990-EZ.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income held at $35k.
From the IRS filings of PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 95% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 71% · 2022 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES's grant income comes from Washington, D.C. funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Organizations like PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington, D.C.
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES?
- PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $147,000 to it, the largest being BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT AFL-CIO ($140,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $147,000 in grants to PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES?
- BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES DEPARTMENT AFL-CIO is the largest funder on record, with $140,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like PLAN FOR THE SETTLEMENT OF JURISDICTIONAL DISPUTES find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Plan for the Settlement of Jurisdictional Disputes →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing