North Dakota · Nonprofit
NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION
NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION (North Dakota) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $610,784 to it, the largest being National Fish and Wildlife Foundation ($532,920). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 4,260 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,260 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Davis Conservation Foundationshared funders
- Northwest North Dakota Community Foundation Incportfolio match
- North Dakota Humanities Councilportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2019 58% · 2020 93% · 2021 87% · 2022 35% · 2023 28% · 2024 46%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
95% of NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2019 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income rose $19k → $110k.
2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 6% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 87% of grant income and the top three 95%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 54% · 2020 89% · 2021 80% · 2022 67% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside North Dakota, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $38k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Davis Conservation Foundationshared fundersME · backs 55 organizations that share your funders
- Northwest North Dakota Community Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- North Dakota Humanities Councilportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- John C Bock Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Fraternal Order of Eaglesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ja Woollam Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Nebraska Academy of Sciencesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Heart of the Rockies Initiativeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Wild Turkey Federation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mid-Nebraska Community Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Association of Conservation Districtsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lute Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In North Dakota
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
95% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION?
- NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION (North Dakota) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $610,784 to it, the largest being National Fish and Wildlife Foundation ($532,920). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $610,784 in grants to NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION?
- National Fish and Wildlife Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $532,920 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like NORTH DAKOTA PRIVATE GRAZING LANDS COALITION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing