Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

North Carolina · Nonprofit

North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey

North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey (North Carolina) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,190 to it, the largest being PLEDGELING FOUNDATION ($5,690). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$385k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$11k
Grants received
$154k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 20%

Against its field

North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 15,926 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin36% · top quartile
Months of reserve7.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)48% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,926 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($17k) Expenses 100 ($17k) Net assets 100 ($229)2018 Revenue 267 ($45k) Expenses 259 ($44k) Net assets 950 ($2k)2019 Revenue 165 ($28k) Expenses 160 ($27k) Net assets 1455 ($3k)2020 Revenue 196 ($33k) Expenses 182 ($31k) Net assets 2637 ($6k)2021 Revenue 72 ($12k) Expenses 83 ($14k) Net assets 1839 ($4k)2022 Revenue 351 ($60k) Expenses 345 ($58k) Net assets 2626 ($6k)2023 Revenue 859 ($146k) Expenses 756 ($127k) Net assets 11031 ($25k)2024 Revenue 713 ($121k) Expenses 788 ($132k) Net assets 6262 ($14k)2025 Revenue 2265 ($385k) Expenses 1462 ($245k) Net assets 67331 ($154k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (2265)Expenses (1462)Net assets (67331)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

84% of North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (58% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,851 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$229
17
$2k
18
$1k
19
$3k
20
$2k
21
$2k
22
$19k
23
$11k
24
$140k
25
7.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

2 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey leans on a few funders — its largest provides 51% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey.

51%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $11k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In North Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 8%Fundraising 0%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey?
North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey (North Carolina) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $11,190 to it, the largest being PLEDGELING FOUNDATION ($5,690). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $11,190 in grants to North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey.
Who is the largest funder of North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey?
PLEDGELING FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $5,690 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like North Carolina Tar Heels Ice Hockey find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing