Washington · Nonprofit
No on 2117 Committee
No on 2117 Committee (Washington) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,765,000 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ($2,000,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 74% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Davis Conservation Foundationshared funders
- Climate Solutionsportfolio match
- Ordinary People Foundationportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
2 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 74% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of No on 2117 Committee’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
No on 2117 Committee leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 94%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund No on 2117 Committee.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
74% of No on 2117 Committee's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $715k that is directly attributable, 90% of it comes from Washington funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2.0M arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Davis Conservation Foundationshared fundersME · backs 61 organizations that share your funders
- Climate Solutionsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ordinary People Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Campion Advocacy Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Washington Conservation Action Education Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Sustainable Path Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Washington Education Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Washington Progress Allianceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Columbia Riverkeeperportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Northwest Fund for the Environmentportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Open Space Institute Land Trust Incshared fundersNY · backs 38 organizations that share your funders
- Bafflin Foundationshared fundersRI · backs 25 organizations that share your funders
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like No on 2117 Committee
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Washington
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
98% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for No on 2117 Committee: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds No on 2117 Committee?
- No on 2117 Committee (Washington) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,765,000 to it, the largest being THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ($2,000,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 74% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does No on 2117 Committee have?
- IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $2,765,000 in grants to No on 2117 Committee, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of No on 2117 Committee?
- THE NATURE CONSERVANCY is the largest funder on record, with $2,000,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like No on 2117 Committee find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing