Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

NCCCAF

NCCCAF (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $51,994 to it, the largest being SC Jade Foundation ($43,694). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$59k
Revenue FY2024
4
Funders on record
$52k
Grants received
$34k
Net assets
1/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 36%

Against its field

NCCCAF has grown faster than three-quarters of the 21,826 education nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve8.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)38% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,826 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2022, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2022, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20222022 Revenue 100 ($31k) Expenses 100 ($30k) Net assets 100 ($10k)2023 Revenue 114 ($36k) Expenses 83 ($25k) Net assets 218 ($21k)2024 Revenue 190 ($59k) Expenses 156 ($47k) Net assets 343 ($34k)
202220232024
Revenue (190)Expenses (156)Net assets (343)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $300 → $13k.

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NCCCAF’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NCCCAF leans on a few funders — its largest provides 84% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

84%
largest funder
99%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of NCCCAF's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $8k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like NCCCAF

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NCCCAF: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NCCCAF?
NCCCAF (California) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $51,994 to it, the largest being SC Jade Foundation ($43,694). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NCCCAF have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $51,994 in grants to NCCCAF, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NCCCAF?
SC Jade Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $43,694 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NCCCAF find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2022–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing