Skip to content

New York · Nonprofit

MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB

MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB (New York) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $700,895 to it, the largest being THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC ($597,395). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$358k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$701k
Net assets
$287k
2/4 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Mohawk Valley Frontiers Club does

Mission

The mission of the organization is taken from article ii - objectives, section 1 of the frontiers international constitution & by - laws: "(a) to promote service as the ideal basis of all worthwhile endeavors (b) to promote the investigation, adoption, and application of higher business, professional, social, and civic standards and procedures (c) to develop by precept, axample and coordination and intelligent aggressive and serviceable leadership and citizenship." the mission of the Mohawk Valley Frontiers Club is to engage in programs that assist and encourage young people toward high academic and social standards which motivate and prepare them for leadership roles in their community. The organization has also provided scholarships to local school students, lunches to the students and the elderly. The organization holds an annual luncheon to educate people about the accomplishments of dr. Martin luther king jr, and an annual golf tournament.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The junior frontiers of the mohawk valley provides various programs for students of color. These programs address many of the issues facing children of color in the community by providing services that help with academic excellence, professional development, civic responsibility, and self esteem. These programs utilize special projects, trips, speakers, events, and tours to expose children to many of the possibilites that exist for their future. This program has grown from assisting 8 students to over 160 students per year.

    $399,101 spentof which $235,038 as grants$64,822 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $399,101.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($148k) Expenses 100 ($94k) Net assets 100 ($110k)2021 Revenue 52 ($77k) Expenses 43 ($40k) Net assets 133 ($147k)2022 Revenue 126 ($186k) Expenses 103 ($96k) Net assets 215 ($237k)2023 Revenue 129 ($191k) Expenses 124 ($116k) Net assets 284 ($313k)2024 Revenue 95 ($141k) Expenses 124 ($116k) Net assets 306 ($338k)2025 Revenue 241 ($358k) Expenses 437 ($408k) Net assets 260 ($287k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (241)Expenses (437)Net assets (260)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $147k to $237k (+62%).

$110k
$147k
$237k
$313k
$338k
$287k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

78% of MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$55k
’20
$37k
’21
$90k
’22
$76k
’23
$25k
’24
−$51k
’25
7.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202320242025
Listed877
Joined·+1+1
No longer listed·21
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $10k → $92k.

3 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB leans on a few funders — its largest provides 85% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB.

85%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 55% · 2020 71% · 2021 88% · 2022 63% · 2023 70% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from New York funders.

NY

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $700k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB has grown faster than three-quarters of the 16,849 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−14% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve7.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)19% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,849 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In New York

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 2%Fundraising 0%

Governance

27
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

48%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

NY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB?
MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB (New York) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $700,895 to it, the largest being THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC ($597,395). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $700,895 in grants to MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB?
THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC is the largest funder on record, with $597,395 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MOHAWK VALLEY FRONTIERS CLUB find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in New York. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing