Skip to content

Virginia · Nonprofit

MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE

MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE (Virginia) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,000 to it, the largest being NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION ($15,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.0M
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$17k
Net assets
$292k
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance does

Mission

Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance's (mdaa) mission is to advocate the deployment and development of a missile defense system by raising awareness and educating the public with this important issue.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Mdaa's has been educating the general public on missile defense issues and the need for a missile defense system program. Mdaa has successfully brought the missile defense issue into the public dialogue. Mdaa has worked toward this purpose by engaging in a broad array of advocacy programs. Mdaa conducts media tours, speaking engagements, testimony before state legislatures, and advocates missile defense issues. Mdaa conducts independent polling to reflect public opinion on missile defense issues. Mdaa representatives meet with civic groups, schools, private individuals and corporate groups to heighten awareness of missile defense issues and to advocate for the deployment of a national missile defense system. Mdaa maintains an educational website that provides information on missile defense issues, advocacy, the latest missile defense news, and public opinion polls. Mdaa sends mdaa alert, which is a newsletter distributed via the internet, ot its members and interested persons. This newsletter details the latest news and developments on missile defense issues and is used as an educational, advocacy and recruitment tool by mdaa. Mdaa alert has been issues bi-weekly.

    $542,534 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $542,534.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.1M) Expenses 100 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($239k)2018 Revenue 93 ($1.0M) Expenses 102 ($1.1M) Net assets 92 ($219k)2019 Revenue 101 ($1.1M) Expenses 108 ($1.1M) Net assets 94 ($224k)2020 Revenue 83 ($929k) Expenses 89 ($920k) Net assets 98 ($233k)2021 Revenue 85 ($943k) Expenses 98 ($1.0M) Net assets 67 ($161k)2022 Revenue 93 ($1.0M) Expenses 105 ($1.1M) Net assets 48 ($114k)2023 Revenue 115 ($1.3M) Expenses 97 ($1.0M) Net assets 164 ($390k)2024 Revenue 44 ($490k) Expenses 86 ($885k) Net assets -2 ($-4981)2025 Revenue 92 ($1.0M) Expenses 71 ($733k) Net assets 122 ($292k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (92)Expenses (71)Net assets (122)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $390k to $20k (−95%).

$239k
$219k
$224k
$233k
$161k
$114k
$390k
$20k
$292k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,680 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$81k
’17
−$18k
’18
$5k
’19
$9k
’20
−$73k
’21
−$47k
’22
$277k
’23
−$395k
’24
$297k
’25
4.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Riki Ellison

CEO/president

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed444566769
Joined·+1+0+1+1+0+2+1+3
No longer listed·10000120
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $2k → $5k.

Funder
'17
'19
'20
'21
total
funders
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 88% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

88% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE.

88%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

88% of MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE's grant income comes from Virginia funders.

IL
VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’19
’20
’21
Virginia out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 798 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin29% · top quartile
Months of reserve4.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 798 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Virginia

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 23%Fundraising 3%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

VA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE?
MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE (Virginia) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,000 to it, the largest being NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION ($15,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $17,000 in grants to MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE?
NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL ASSOCIATION is the largest funder on record, with $15,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MISSILE DEFENSE ADVOCACY ALLIANCE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Virginia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing