Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Michigan · Nonprofit

MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER

MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $49,500 to it, the largest being MICHIGAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ($34,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$5k
Revenue FY2023
2
Funders on record
$50k
Grants received
$640
Net assets
0/2 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−77% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−63% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,352 community improvement nonprofits under $100k, FY2023

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 0 ($0) Expenses 100 ($12k) Net assets 100 ($2k)2018 Revenue 100 ($626k) Expenses 5329 ($624k) Net assets 189 ($4k)2019 Revenue 2 ($10k) Expenses 94 ($11k) Net assets 137 ($3k)2020 Revenue 5 ($30k) Expenses 235 ($28k) Net assets 257 ($5k)2021 Revenue 0 ($0) Expenses 8 ($900) Net assets 213 ($4k)2022 Revenue 5 ($30k) Expenses 259 ($30k) Net assets 199 ($4k)2023 Revenue 1 ($5k) Expenses 68 ($8k) Net assets 31 ($640)
2017201820192020202120222023
Revenue (1)Expenses (68)Net assets (31)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (77% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 10,189 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$12k
17
$2k
18
$1k
19
$2k
20
$900
21
$284
22
$3k
23
0.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $15k → $35k.

From the IRS filings of MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.

How concentrated its funding is

MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

70%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.

Where its funders are

70% of MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER?
MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $49,500 to it, the largest being MICHIGAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ($34,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $49,500 in grants to MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER.
Who is the largest funder of MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER?
MICHIGAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE is the largest funder on record, with $34,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MICHIGAN CHAMBER LITIGATION CENTER find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2017–2023), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing