Loading…
Loading…
Louisiana · Nonprofit
LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING INC (Louisiana) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $225,663 in grants to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF NORTHEAST LOUISIANA INC ($191,435). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING INC is better cushioned than half of the 19,863 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 19,863 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2022
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
92% of LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (87% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
$6k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $30k and 1 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 85% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 86% · 2021 86% · 2022 86% · 2023 84% · 2024 100% · 2025 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
LINCOLN COUNCIL ON AGING INC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Louisiana funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2018–2022), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing