Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
LEELANAU COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY (Michigan) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $48,500 in grants to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($27,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
LEELANAU COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 14,102 arts & culture nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,102 arts & culture nonprofits under $100k, FY2021
$20k from 2 funders in 2022, up from $29k and 2 in 2018.
1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 56% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of LEELANAU COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
LEELANAU COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 95% · 2022 50% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
LEELANAU COUNTY HISTORIC PRESERVATION SOCIETY draws 56% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2021 (financials across 2021–2021), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing