Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS (Massachusetts) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $36,000 to it, the largest being LINCOLN & THERESE FILENE FOUNDATION INC #0706176 ($35,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$159k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$36k
Grants received
$145k
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Against its field

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS is better cushioned than half of the 814 civil rights nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−35% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve7.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 814 civil rights nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($143k) Expenses 100 ($205k) Net assets 100 ($177k)2018 Revenue 107 ($154k) Expenses 64 ($131k) Net assets 113 ($200k)2019 Revenue 93 ($133k) Expenses 82 ($169k) Net assets 93 ($165k)2020 Revenue 79 ($113k) Expenses 64 ($131k) Net assets 82 ($146k)2021 Revenue 140 ($200k) Expenses 79 ($162k) Net assets 104 ($184k)2022 Revenue 164 ($234k) Expenses 92 ($189k) Net assets 129 ($229k)2023 Revenue 155 ($222k) Expenses 111 ($228k) Net assets 126 ($224k)2024 Revenue 151 ($216k) Expenses 116 ($239k) Net assets 113 ($201k)2025 Revenue 111 ($159k) Expenses 105 ($215k) Net assets 82 ($145k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (111)Expenses (105)Net assets (82)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

81% of LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,977 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$62k
17
$23k
18
$35k
19
$19k
20
$38k
21
$45k
22
$5k
23
$23k
24
$56k
25
7.1
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2022: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $11k → $10k.

Left out of every figure on this page: $13k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest League of Women Voters Lotte E Scharfman Memorial Fund). These are real filings, and they are not money LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS raised.

From the IRS filings of LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 97% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

97%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 91% · 2022 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS's grant income comes from Massachusetts funders.

MA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
22
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

64% of spending goes to programs.

Program 64%Management 20%Fundraising 16%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • League of Women Voters Lotte E Scharfman Memorial Fund · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS?
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS (Massachusetts) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $36,000 to it, the largest being LINCOLN & THERESE FILENE FOUNDATION INC #0706176 ($35,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $36,000 in grants to LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS?
LINCOLN & THERESE FILENE FOUNDATION INC #0706176 is the largest funder on record, with $35,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MASSACHUSETTS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing