Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST

KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $37,250 to it, the largest being Central Texas Food Bank Inc ($30,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$247k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$37k
Grants received
$541k
Net assets
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%

Against its field

KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,749 food & nutrition nonprofits its size.

Operating margin58% · top quartile
Months of reserve62.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,749 food & nutrition nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($86k) Expenses 100 ($61k) Net assets 100 ($86k)2018 Revenue 105 ($91k) Expenses 93 ($56k) Net assets 140 ($120k)2019 Revenue 74 ($64k) Expenses 88 ($53k) Net assets 152 ($130k)2020 Revenue 143 ($123k) Expenses 95 ($58k) Net assets 229 ($196k)2021 Revenue 209 ($180k) Expenses 160 ($97k) Net assets 326 ($279k)2022 Revenue 150 ($129k) Expenses 193 ($117k) Net assets 340 ($291k)2023 Revenue 175 ($151k) Expenses 156 ($95k) Net assets 409 ($350k)2024 Revenue 229 ($198k) Expenses 191 ($116k) Net assets 502 ($429k)2025 Revenue 286 ($247k) Expenses 172 ($104k) Net assets 632 ($541k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (286)Expenses (172)Net assets (632)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2025 96%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

96% of KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (95% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,353 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$25k
17
$34k
18
$10k
19
$66k
20
$83k
21
$12k
22
$56k
23
$82k
24
$142k
25
62
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'21
'25*
total
funders
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST leans on a few funders — its largest provides 81% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST.

81%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST's grant income comes from Texas funders.

TX

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

38% of spending goes to programs.

Program 38%Management 62%Fundraising 0%

Governance

0
board members
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST?
KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $37,250 to it, the largest being Central Texas Food Bank Inc ($30,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $37,250 in grants to KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST.
Who is the largest funder of KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST?
Central Texas Food Bank Inc is the largest funder on record, with $30,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KINGSLAND SHARING THE HARVEST find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing