Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
KING CHILD SUPERVISION INC (Michigan) is funded by 1 grantmaker whose IRS filings report $20,000 in grants to it, the largest being Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
KING CHILD SUPERVISION INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,343 unclassified nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,343 unclassified nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
35% of KING CHILD SUPERVISION INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (68% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of KING CHILD SUPERVISION INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
KING CHILD SUPERVISION INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 1 states in all.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
53% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing