Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

South Carolina · Nonprofit

J M SMITH FOUNDATION

J M SMITH FOUNDATION (South Carolina) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,859,382 to it, the largest being Spartanburg County Foundation ($1,789,382). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$472k
Revenue FY2026
3
Funders on record
$1.9M
Grants received
$902k
Net assets
3/3 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

J M SMITH FOUNDATION's revenue fell 89% between 2017 and 2026.

Months of reserve19.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−21% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 27 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2026

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4.1M) Expenses 100 ($2.9M) Net assets 100 ($3.8M)2018 Revenue 87 ($3.6M) Expenses 113 ($3.2M) Net assets 110 ($4.2M)2019 Revenue 52 ($2.2M) Expenses 107 ($3.1M) Net assets 86 ($3.3M)2020 Revenue 18 ($755k) Expenses 97 ($2.8M) Net assets 34 ($1.3M)2021 Revenue 7 ($275k) Expenses 49 ($1.4M) Net assets 50 ($1.9M)2022 Revenue 14 ($560k) Expenses 43 ($1.2M) Net assets 33 ($1.3M)2023 Revenue 13 ($549k) Expenses 22 ($630k) Net assets 31 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 14 ($573k) Expenses 19 ($540k) Net assets 32 ($1.2M)2025 Revenue 7 ($295k) Expenses 19 ($537k) Net assets 26 ($977k)2026 Revenue 11 ($472k) Expenses 19 ($547k) Net assets 24 ($902k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (11)Expenses (19)Net assets (24)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $7k → $14k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
3
1
1
2
2
2
2
1

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)99% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of J M SMITH FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

J M SMITH FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 96% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

99% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund J M SMITH FOUNDATION.

96%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 35% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 67% · 2022 50% · 2023 50%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

99% of J M SMITH FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $14k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside South Carolina, across 1 state.

MI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
South Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.8M arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like J M SMITH FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for J M SMITH FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds J M SMITH FOUNDATION?
J M SMITH FOUNDATION (South Carolina) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,859,382 to it, the largest being Spartanburg County Foundation ($1,789,382). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 99% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does J M SMITH FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $1,859,382 in grants to J M SMITH FOUNDATION, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of J M SMITH FOUNDATION?
Spartanburg County Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $1,789,382 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like J M SMITH FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing