Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Texas · Nonprofit

Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States

Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $74,500 to it, the largest being JOHN H LYONS SR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ($49,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$625k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$75k
Grants received
$1.4M
Net assets
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%

Against its field

Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,331 employment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin21% · above the median
Months of reserve31.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,331 employment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($473k) Expenses 100 ($525k) Net assets 100 ($1.0M)2018 Revenue 103 ($487k) Expenses 90 ($471k) Net assets 102 ($1.0M)2019 Revenue 143 ($675k) Expenses 130 ($681k) Net assets 101 ($1.0M)2020 Revenue 145 ($686k) Expenses 124 ($652k) Net assets 104 ($1.1M)2021 Revenue 109 ($517k) Expenses 80 ($420k) Net assets 114 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 97 ($459k) Expenses 104 ($544k) Net assets 106 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 104 ($491k) Expenses 92 ($482k) Net assets 106 ($1.1M)2024 Revenue 123 ($582k) Expenses 82 ($431k) Net assets 121 ($1.2M)2025 Revenue 132 ($625k) Expenses 94 ($496k) Net assets 134 ($1.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (132)Expenses (94)Net assets (134)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

0% of Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (54% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,317 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$52k
17
$16k
18
$6k
19
$34k
20
$96k
21
$85k
22
$9k
23
$150k
24
$130k
25
31
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'18
'25*
total
funders
1
1

From the IRS filings of Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States.

66%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Texas, across 1 state in all.

DC

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

25% of spending goes to programs.

Program 25%Management 75%Fundraising 0%

Governance

31
board members
97%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Iron Workers State COPE Fund · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States?
Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States (Texas) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $74,500 to it, the largest being JOHN H LYONS SR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ($49,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $74,500 in grants to Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States.
Who is the largest funder of Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States?
JOHN H LYONS SR SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $49,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Iron Workers District Council of Texas and the Mid-South States find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing