Skip to content

Arizona · Nonprofit

INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE

INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE (Arizona) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $502,475 to it, the largest being Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($312,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 62% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2022
$132k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$502k
Net assets
$28k
2/2 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What International Earthlight Alliance does

Mission

Basic research; intern'l collaboration, education, health and environmental awareness the intern'l earthlight alliance (iea) employs a unique approach to stimulate student and public interest and curiousity about science. Iea investigates high visability but little understood anomalies as a learning vehicle using rigorous scientific methodology and state of the art tech- nology, iea continues to investigate diverse areas of public interest that are often neglected by mainstream science among these areas are lands where measurable geophysical anomalies exist such as sacred sites , earthlight areas and geopathic zones. Health issues at some of these anomalous geophysical sites are under study. Additionally, temporal anomalies preceding seismic activity, both geophysical and animal behavior, is part of iea's environmental studies. Grand $131569 end of year $28450

As stated on its FY2022 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Tax year 2021 presented several challenges to the International Earthlight Alliance. Due to Covid restrictions equipment and experiment maintenance was more challenging. Visits to hardware stores was more difficult. In addition to Covid-19 restrictions the landlord at 65 Golden Eagle Dr. finally gave a serious move out notice after threatening move-outs spring and or summer for at least the last four-five years. The landlord gave notice in late summer. The complicated move of dismantling the research facility, transporting, and setting up equipment and communications was completed in mid-November 2021. From July to the end of the year research efforts were distracted by and redirected to packing and moving the fragile instruments and a large amount of expedition gear. An attempt was made to keep all data acquisition online until the last minute possible. There was approximately a quarter mile of various wire types that had to be retrieved from the field, so some experiments such as the magnetometer and seismometer were discontinued earlier. A detailed daily log of prevailing environmental, solar terrestrial data, and observations was continued. Instrumentation and expedition…

The program described on its FY2022 Form 990-EZ.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($135k) Expenses 100 ($125k) Net assets 100 ($81k)2018 Revenue 72 ($97k) Expenses 100 ($125k) Net assets 65 ($53k)2019 Revenue 103 ($139k) Expenses 105 ($131k) Net assets 75 ($61k)2020 Revenue 72 ($97k) Expenses 101 ($126k) Net assets 46 ($37k)2021 Revenue 72 ($96k) Expenses 84 ($105k) Net assets 35 ($28k)2022 Revenue 98 ($132k) Expenses 106 ($132k) Net assets 35 ($28k)
201720182019202020212022
Revenue (98)Expenses (106)Net assets (35)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $84k to $53k (−37%).

$84k
$53k
$63k
$39k
$30k
$30k
201720182019202020212022
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (79% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 882 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$10k
’17
−$28k
’18
$8k
’19
−$29k
’20
−$9k
’21
−$713
’22
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $59k → $38k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 62% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE.

62%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 51% · 2022 58% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

62% of INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $190k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Arizona, across 1 state.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’21
’22
’23
Arizona out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $312k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $502k to it.

Operating margin−1% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−0% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 690 science & tech nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2022

Organizations like INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Arizona

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE?
INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE (Arizona) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $502,475 to it, the largest being Silicon Valley Community Foundation ($312,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 62% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $502,475 in grants to INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE?
Silicon Valley Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $312,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INTERNATIONAL EARTHLIGHT ALLIANCE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds International Earthlight Alliance →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2017–2022), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing