California · Nonprofit
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $115,000 to it, the largest being The American Society for Reproductive Medicine ($90,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE has grown faster than three-quarters of the 658 science & tech nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 658 science & tech nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Lupus Research Alliance Incshared funders
- Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Incportfolio match
- Every Mother Countsportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
96% of INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (89% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $15k → $10k.
From the IRS filings of INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 100% · 2019 67% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 67% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 1 state in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Lupus Research Alliance Incshared fundersNY · backs 19 organizations that share your funders
- Project Hope - the People-To-People Health Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Every Mother Countsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Population Services Internationalportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- U S-Ukraine Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Endowment for Democracyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kakani Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Nations Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Rural India Supporting Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Women's Health Networkportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mel and Fran Harris Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Engenderhealth Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE?
- INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $115,000 to it, the largest being The American Society for Reproductive Medicine ($90,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $115,000 in grants to INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE?
- The American Society for Reproductive Medicine is the largest funder on record, with $90,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing