Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $115,000 to it, the largest being THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ($90,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$66k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$115k
Net assets
$306k
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 36%
01What it does

What International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive does

Mission

To research and collect data, prepare reports, and analyze information regarding assisted reproductive technologies and to function as a technical advisor to other organizations, such as the world health organization, in connection with assisted reproductibe technologies.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Statistical reports and development of digital data collection platform.

    $57,100 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $57,100.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($41k) Expenses 100 ($31k) Net assets 100 ($167k)2018 Revenue 275 ($113k) Expenses 298 ($91k) Net assets 113 ($189k)2019 Revenue 187 ($77k) Expenses 291 ($89k) Net assets 106 ($177k)2020 Revenue 118 ($49k) Expenses 83 ($25k) Net assets 120 ($200k)2021 Revenue 267 ($110k) Expenses 120 ($37k) Net assets 163 ($272k)2022 Revenue 257 ($106k) Expenses 138 ($42k) Net assets 194 ($324k)2023 Revenue 189 ($78k) Expenses 220 ($67k) Net assets 200 ($334k)2024 Revenue 161 ($66k) Expenses 309 ($95k) Net assets 183 ($306k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (161)Expenses (309)Net assets (183)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $200k to $277k (+38%).

$167k
$189k
$177k
$200k
$277k
$325k
$345k
$316k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

96% of INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (89% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 835 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$11k
’17
$22k
’18
−$12k
’19
$23k
’20
$73k
’21
$63k
’22
$11k
’23
−$28k
’24

Leadership and staff

Board chair

G David Adamson

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $15k → $10k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
2
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE.

78%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 67% · 2018 100% · 2019 67% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 67% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 2 states in all.

DC
AL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE has grown faster than three-quarters of the 660 science & tech nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−43% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 660 science & tech nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Organizations like INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE?
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $115,000 to it, the largest being THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE ($90,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $115,000 in grants to INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE?
THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE is the largest funder on record, with $90,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR MONITORING ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing