Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $29,680 to it, the largest being Yale University ($16,013). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$14M
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$30k
Net assets
$4.8M
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission does

Mission

The iattc is responsible for the conservation and management of fisheries for tunas and other species taken by tuna-fishing vessels in the eastern pacific ocean.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Aidcp on-board observer program to assess the status of dolphin populations by providing funding for observers on 100% of the fishing trips in large purse-seine size class 6 vessels. Its goal is to ensure the long-term sustainability of the tuna stocks in the agreement area, as well as that of the marine resources related to this fishery, taking into consideration the interrelationship among species in the ecosystem, with special emphasis on, inter alia, avoiding, reducing and minimizing bycatch and discards of juvenile tunas and non-target species.

    $3,593,100 spent$2,654,533 earned by the program
    31% of program spending
  2. The biology program consists of the investigations of the biology, life history, vital statistics, population structure, and behavior of tunas and billfish.

    $1,406,117 spent
    12% of program spending
  3. The data collection and data bank program collects, compiles and analyzes all catch statistic and fishing logbook data gathered by the iattc.

    $1,370,612 spent
    12% of program spending
  4. Various other programs and administrative support that contribute to the core objective and mission of the organization through continued investigative research in the area of marine biology and other disciplines relevant to the conservation and management of tuna and tuna like fish stocks that are caught by vessels in the eastern pacific ocean.

    $5,088,416 spent$1,707,164 earned by the program
    44% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $11,458,245.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($12M) Expenses 100 ($11M) Net assets 100 ($3.3M)2018 Revenue 88 ($11M) Expenses 113 ($12M) Net assets 58 ($2.0M)2019 Revenue 135 ($16M) Expenses 135 ($14M) Net assets 113 ($3.8M)2020 Revenue 83 ($9.9M) Expenses 114 ($12M) Net assets 50 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 131 ($16M) Expenses 108 ($11M) Net assets 180 ($6.0M)2022 Revenue 116 ($14M) Expenses 125 ($13M) Net assets 201 ($6.7M)2023 Revenue 100 ($12M) Expenses 136 ($14M) Net assets 132 ($4.4M)2024 Revenue 119 ($14M) Expenses 131 ($14M) Net assets 145 ($4.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (119)Expenses (131)Net assets (145)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $6.8M to $11M (+57%).

$7.9M
$7.3M
$8.6M
$6.8M
$11M
$11M
$9.7M
$9.8M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 65% · 2018 54% · 2019 59% · 2020 47% · 2021 67% · 2022 63% · 2023 64% · 2024 68%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

68% of INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (67% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 235 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.4M
’17
−$1.4M
’18
$1.8M
’19
−$2.1M
’20
$4.3M
’21
$718k
’22
−$2.3M
’23
$449k
’24
8.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Andres Arens

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed3171808075726970
Joined·+50+25+28+10+12+22+17
No longer listed·10162815152516
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2020: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $16k → $14k.

Funder
'18
'20
total
funders
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 54% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION.

54%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

54% of INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $14k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside California, across 1 state.

DC

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $16k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 235 animals nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Months of reserve8.2mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 235 animals nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Government funding INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $17.8M on record.

Federal$17.8M
grants $17.8Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of State$17.8M
  • Department of the Interior$10k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 17%Fundraising 0%

Governance

21
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION?
INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $29,680 to it, the largest being Yale University ($16,013). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $29,680 in grants to INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION.
Who is the largest funder of INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION?
Yale University is the largest funder on record, with $16,013 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INTER-AMERICAN TROPICAL TUNA COMMISSION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing