Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS OF THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE (New York) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $395,830 in grants to it, the largest being Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ($361,980). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS OF THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE has grown faster than half of the 739 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 739 international nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
0% of INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS OF THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $72k → $87k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
2 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS OF THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS OF THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 82% · 2022 97% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
INSTITUTE OF HUMAN RELATIONS OF THE AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside New York — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
71% of spending goes to programs.
Part of a family of 7 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing