Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Michigan · Nonprofit

INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM

INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM (Michigan) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,017,500 to it, the largest being THE ANDREW W MELLON FOUNDATION ($600,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.5M
Revenue FY2023
6
Funders on record
$2.0M
Grants received
$1.5M
Net assets
4/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 81%

Against its field

INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 160 social science nonprofits its size.

Operating margin68% · top quartile
Months of reserve18.4mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)217% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 160 social science nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2023

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($153k) Expenses 100 ($207k) Net assets -13 ($-54520)2022 Revenue 512 ($782k) Expenses 154 ($319k) Net assets 100 ($409k)2023 Revenue 1007 ($1.5M) Expenses 240 ($497k) Net assets 355 ($1.5M)
202120222023
Revenue (1007)Expenses (240)Net assets (355)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

94% of INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 181 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

$55k
21
$463k
22
$1.0M
23
18
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2022 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $200k → $1.3M.

From the IRS filings of INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM leans on a few funders — its largest provides 30% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

30%
largest funder
78%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 100% · 2023 48%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM draws 55% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan, across 2 states in all.

MI
NY

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

22
23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

90% of spending goes to programs.

Program 90%Management 7%Fundraising 3%

Governance

3
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM?
INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM (Michigan) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,017,500 to it, the largest being THE ANDREW W MELLON FOUNDATION ($600,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $2,017,500 in grants to INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM?
THE ANDREW W MELLON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $600,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INSTITUTE FOR AFROURBANISM find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2021–2023), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing